Skip to content
allan's profile

New Contributor

 • 

24 Messages

Saturday, November 8th, 2025

Prefix Delegation Disabled

Is anyone else having issues with their delegated IPv6 prefix? Our CGA4332COM correctly shows our assigned /56 address but it is not handing out the /59 prefix to our router-firewall. This seems to have started this week so I suspect this is caused by a recent firmware update. Tier 1 support refused to assign us a ticket and refused to escalate. They were going to send a tech on-site but charge us for the service since their monitors all show green. I could not convince them that this is not a line or hardware issue. Until this is resolved, my servers are unreachable on their IPv6 addresses.

Wireshark shows the following DHCPv6 response (emphasis mine) which makes me think this was through an update. If that is the case, we can't be the only ones having this problem.

Identity Association for Prefix Delegation
    Option: Identity Association for Prefix Delegation (25)
    Length: 83
    IAID: 00000000
    T1: 0
    T2: 0
    Status code
        Option: Status code (13)
        Length: 67
        Status Code: NoPrefixAvail (6)
        Status Message: Server support for prefix delegation is not enabled. Sorry buddy.

Our firmware versions:

eMTA & DOCSIS Software Version:CM DOCSIS Application - Prod_23.2_231009 & MTA Application - Prod_23.2_231009
Software Image Name:CGA4332COM_8.2p5s1_PROD_sey
Advanced Services:CGA4332COM
Packet Cable:2.0
Oldest First
Selected Oldest First

Official Employee

 • 

24 Messages

1 month ago

allan thank you for reaching out and letting us know about the concern you have come across with your IPV6 prefix. We can get a ticket submitted on your behalf for our Business Support team to aid in addressing. 

 

Can you send over a direct message to get started?

Here's the detailed steps to direct message us:

• Click "Sign In" if necessary

• Click the "Peer to peer chat" icon (upper right corner of this page)

• Click the "New message" (pencil and paper) icon

• Type "Comcast Business" in the to line and select "Comcast Business" from the drop-down list

• Type your message in the text area near the bottom of the window

• Press Enter to send your message. 

New Contributor

 • 

24 Messages

Hello @Comcast_Marcus I sent a chat message to Comcast Business with a link to this post.

New Contributor

 • 

24 Messages

1 month ago

I had my Comcast modem replaced and the new unit came with an older firmware version (8.1p8s2). This version fixed the issue. To anyone going this route, you will get a new IPv6 block and re-IP your servers.

Identity Association for Prefix Delegation
    Option: Identity Association for Prefix Delegation (25)
    Length: 69
    IAID: 00000000
    T1: 1800
    T2: 2880
    IA Prefix
        Option: IA Prefix (26)
        Length: 25
        Preferred lifetime: 3600
        Valid lifetime: 3600
        Prefix length: 59
        Prefix address: 2603:3018:xxxx:xxxx::
    Status code
        Option: Status code (13)
        Length: 24
        Status Code: Success (0)
        Status Message: Assigned 1 prefix(es).

The new unit has the following firmware versions:

eMTA & DOCSIS Software Version:CM DOCSIS Application - Prod_23.2_231009 & MTA Application - Prod_23.2_231009
Software Image Name:CGA4332COM_8.1p8s2_PROD_sey
Advanced Services:CGA4332COM
Packet Cable:2.0

Official Employee

 • 

2 Messages

Hey there, Allan! I see that your ticket is still open, but we wanted to check in with you to see how everything is going.

New Contributor

 • 

24 Messages

The tech replaced the modem with an older firmware version on Nov 13 as I posted above. It worked without issue until Nov 18 when the modem updated to the faulty version again - 8.2p5s1. I confirmed just now (Nov 20) that our IPv6 service is still down. We thought we presented enough evidence that this is firmware related. Needless to say we are disappointed that we have to go through this service outage again. This is unacceptable for a business-class service.

Official Employee

 • 

34 Messages

Good evening allan thank you so much for taking the time to follow up on this issue! We do still have an open line of communication with the advanced team that have been assisting, and would be happy to forward any new findings or testing you have so this issue can be worked through. Please reach us via the open 1-1 conversation we have saved with you. 

 

New Contributor

 • 

12 Messages

25 days ago

I'm experiencing the same NoPrefixAvail error on my router, my ticket has sat in Comcast's advanced support queue for 26 hours now with absolutely no sign that anything is being done. Level 1 reps have rebooted and broken my service in multiple ways, and escalated support just isn't doing anything.

What's the magic combination to get my issue taken seriously? I'm paying extra for a feature that's broken after an automatic reboot of my modem, and nobody seems to care but me.

Official Employee

 • 

41 Messages

Hello, @thetommyc! You are at the right place for further help with the router prefix. I am sorry you are feeling that way. We want your service to work flawlessly. We understand it is frustrating when there is a problem. Our advanced team goes through a number of steps to find and resolve the issue. Their work can sometimes take a little bit depending on what needs to be done, such as an engineering issue. We can check on your advanced repair ticket and go from there.

 

Please send us a direct message with your full name and complete service address to “Xfinity Support”. To do so, click on the direct messaging icon located at the top right of this forums page.

Here's the detailed steps to direct message us:
• Click "Sign In" if necessary
• Click the "Direct Message” icon (upper right corner of this page)
• Click the "New message" (pencil and paper) icon
• Type "Xfinity Support" in the to line and select "Xfinity Support" from the drop-down list
• Type your message in the text area near the bottom of the window
• Press Enter to send your message

New Contributor

 • 

12 Messages

@Comcast_Ray​ I sent a message. It wouldn't be as big an issue for the research to take a while if there was ANY communication with customers. Leaving us totally in the dark isn't really acceptable, especially when first line support says I should expect to hear from someone within 8 hours.

New Contributor

 • 

21 Messages

24 days ago

Just got bit by this bug early this morning.  Support is going to contact the firmware team and see about a rollback and hopefully a fix.

Support did confirm that my modem firmware was updated last night.

(edited)

New Contributor

 • 

21 Messages

24 days ago

@Comcast_Ray I think part of the frustration is from this being at least the third firmware update that has broken IPv6 in a way that can't be worked around by the customer.  And we as customers are just stuck every time this happens.  If we had a customer driven way to revert to the previous firmware until the latest firmware is fixed this wouldn't be as frustrating.  But lately it's just been luck of the draw as to what's going to break the next time a firmware update comes out.

All this is compounded by the fact that these firmware updates are clearly not tested in any significant way.  These bugs are not "corner cases" by any stretch of the imagination, and yet they manage to slip through to customers modems.  We aren't residential customers.  We're business customers paying a significantly larger bill for our services, it doesn't seem inappropriate for us to expect things not to break in obvious ways.

Official Employee

 • 

77 Messages

@gantzm_mi Thanks for that feedback, and I will make sure it is submitted. We are always looking for ways to improve the customer experience. We want to ensure that your services are working throughout firmware updates. Let us know if you have any additional feedback we can provide. 

New Contributor

 • 

12 Messages

@Comcast_Jen​ Following up on this, it has now been since 02:00 on Tuesday that I've been dealing with this. Comcast support has "escalated" my ticket to Tier 2 support, who has not done anything with the ticket. I have requested a manager call back, which has gone ignored. I have requested an update on the ticket's progress, which has gone unanswered.

I pay for this service, and the official policy of Comcast is that it's in essence unsupported. I have had issues several times in the past with the static IPv6 service, and no changes have been made. Level 1 support doesn't understand the difference between IPv4 and IPv6, which would be fine if they didn't keep trying to diagnose IPv4 issues when I call in.

At this point, I'm honestly at a loss. There's clearly a bug here. Level 2 support either knows about it and isn't doing anything or even communicating that they know back to customers, OR they aren't actually looking into the problem and don't care to diagnose the IPv6 trouble tickets they receive. That's the only conclusion I can possibly come to after waiting a week for help. I have no real recourse whatsoever, since nobody inside support feels any pressure to get this fixed. So I'm left to complain to the void here on the forums.

New Contributor

 • 

9 Messages

@Comcast_Jen​ - Comcast as a company has demonstrated, time and again, that they absolutely don't give a [Edited - Language] about serving their business customers any better than this.  This is their chosen level of regard for customers.  All the company cares more about is receiving their payments from the customers for their monthly bills.  I challenge you to show and prove to us otherwise.  I'm waiting.

(PS - This isn't anything personal against you.  This is from a customer to the company, and both know this isn't acceptable service)

(edited)

New Contributor

 • 

21 Messages

23 days ago

Support attempted to revert my modem back to the previous firmware version.  The revert didn't seem to take though as the modem is still on the 8.2 version.  Support indicated they would work with the firmware team to figure out why that didn't work.  Fingers crossed maybe they can get the firmware reverted until a fix is found.

New Contributor

 • 

12 Messages

Incredibly, corporate escalations got back to me, said the problem is my fault since my router has an address assigned to its external interface, and they seemed really stunned by the fact I have logs showing interface addresses and the prefix error response. My ticket is now "being escalated" even though that was supposed to happen on Wednesday.

New Contributor

 • 

24 Messages

@thetommyc​ when I opened the ticket on Nov 8, I made sure to call out that our modem has its assigned /56 and the issue is on the modem itself--not upstream. All their monitors are green because everything is working except for the handoff.

New Contributor

 • 

12 Messages

@allan​ I have explained to support reps countless times at this point how v6 works on the Comcast network, and how without PD I can't get traffic routed because their network won't have a route for my address(es). I've also had to explain how I have logs showing their modem's LAN interface responding with NoPrefixAvail to my router's WAN interface. The corporate escalations lady had a accusatory attitude from the jump, and finally when I told her I have call logs and router logs showing how long I've been dealing with this and that it's clearly their problem, she said she'd escalate to another internal group almost as a challenge to me.

I'm finally talking to people that might be able to do something for me, but I'm still having to explain v6 PD to everybody. Every single person says because the router has a public v6 address it's clearly working until I point out that the part I PAY for is the static assignment which requires PD. There's no recourse for us as customers, because Comcast basically refuses to support this service that we pay for, they're clearly not training people internally on IPv6, and if you live where there's no competition (yet) there isn't a service you can leave them for.

Fortunately for me, the new year should be bringing a new service provider to my area. Hopefully I can move off this service and get support for the products I pay for.

New Contributor

 • 

21 Messages

23 days ago

Woke up this morning to find my modem has been reverted to "CGA4332COM_8.1p8s2_PROD_sey" and prefix delegation once again works.  According to my internal alerts this happened sometime around 3:02AM EST with the modem rebooting possibly once or twice from 3:02AM EST to 3:39AM EST.

New Contributor

 • 

3 Messages

22 days ago

I can confirm I am seeing the same issue as well. I am a few days behind from being able to troubleshoot this, but was able to dig in and luckily found this post. I'm hoping I can request to be downgraded to the older firmware, but I'm sure there is nothing stopping it from being upgraded again. 

Here is my same message after a PD request

Identity Association for Prefix Delegation
    Option: Identity Association for Prefix Delegation (25)
    Length: 83
    IAID: 00000003
    T1: 0
    T2: 0
    Status code
        Option: Status code (13)
        Length: 67
        Status Code: NoPrefixAvail (6)
        Status Message: Server support for prefix delegation is not enabled. Sorry buddy.

Modem version Software Image Name:CGA4332COM_8.2p5s1_PROD_sey

Official Employee

 • 

4 Messages

Greetings, kweevuss! I hope your weekend has been treating you well. Thanks so much for taking a moment out of your busy day to leave a post on our Comcast Business Community forum. I'm sorry to hear you're experiencing the same issue. We understand it is vital for you to have peace of mind when you're connected online. Rest assured, you have reached the right team to assist you with this matter. I noticed you have sent us a direct message. We will proceed with a direct message for further assistance. 

 

New Member

 • 

3 Messages

oh not again... Me and a friend worked with Phil (your IP Engr VP), your IPv6 3rd level support guy in Colorado Springs and the India coding team for ~4 mos to figure out the last bug, which was they forgot to update the ipfw filter rules in the box when assiging a new address or PD, so it was deaf inbound after an IA-PD. It worked exactly once. Remember that one ? They also had the exp timers set to totally silly values too.  That took 2 more months to get fixed. Seems like they have busted  IA-PD again in a new way. Looks like you folks have the bug identified,  let me see if that VP is still on the job. I just checked, he's gone. What really bugs me is that I have to explain IPv6 every time I call in, it's really annoying. Before you ask, the way I was able to get to them was that another member of the IETF, (ex Silicon Valley Area Director) who worked on much of the v6 RFCs knows those guys and I know him and he called up and spoke with them and me. I cant tell you how many dozens of emails, calls, txts we exchanged. I will start again with my fellow IETF friends and see whom I can call.

Official Employee

 • 

46 Messages

@geoffb I’m sorry to hear you're having repeat issues with your connection. Our apologies you have to start over when reaching out. Please give us a call at (800) 391-3000 so we can assist you and escalate your concerns accordingly.  

New Member

 • 

3 Messages

Kei, I will call, but there must be HUNDREDS of boxes affected for you guys. A second problem is that your CMTS Net Mgmt sytem thinks everything is fine because there is a v6 address assigned to the exterior modem interface, *but there's no route internally as the PD didnt fly*, so just seeing an address, with no route, is meaningless. But my larger issue is that people at the ISP's still seem untrained on IPv6 generally, sigh... Example, I am testing Sonic Fiber and they have their own set of issues with v6, such as having the timers for IA's set to ~5 min, which causes flapping, so.. They admitted they have no idea about IPv6 and said I should make a Forum posting over there for help, like really ? I may just have to go back to Hurricane and run a 6 in 4 off a pi like I did in 2018 ? In 2025, geez... Not being rude ! 

Official Employee

 • 

46 Messages

@geoffb I'm sorry to hear you were told to reach out on the forums when you called in. This is not the experience we want for anyone. Can you please direct message me your first and last name along with your full service address so that I can assist.
Here's the detailed steps to direct message us:
• Click "Sign In" if necessary
• Click the "Direct Message” icon (upper right corner of this page)
• Click the "New message" (pencil and paper) icon
• Type "Comcast Business" in the to line and select "Comcast Business" from the drop-down list
• Type your message in the text area near the bottom of the window
• Press Enter to send your message.

New Contributor

 • 

12 Messages

21 days ago

It has been a full week of chasing down Comcast on this issue. I have an ECM ticket which first level phone support doesn't seem to be able to view for some reason? I've had a couple higher level engineers call me back, but so far I have to explain IPv6 delegation to everybody I talk to. The common refrain is "Your router has a v6 address, so v6 is working", but the folks don't seem to realize that paying for static v6 means delegation is a required feature.

I'm at a loss here, because when I call in the first support folks seem shocked that there was a 24h estimation on the original trouble ticket. But there's obviously very little they can do to change any of this. I emailed logs on Saturday, because I finally spoke to someone that wanted to see them or at least add them to the ticket, but after nearly a full business day today I still haven't heard anything. Not even a courtesy call to say they're still actively working on the problem.

What did it take last time there was a modem firmware bug? What was necessary to get that escalated to the point where anybody took it serious? Do we just rely on someone here happening to know an executive, or is there an official process that those of us with engineering skills can use to get to the correct people internally and work on these kinds of problems? It's frustrating to pay for business service and experience a worse SLA than a home account, but it's downright insulting to need to explain comcast products to comcast support reps when I'm relying on them to fix my issues. These poor people haven't been given the training, or even a script to follow for this level of support.

New Contributor

 • 

24 Messages

What did it take last time there was a modem firmware bug? What was necessary to get that escalated to the point where anybody took it serious? Do we just rely on someone here happening to know an executive, or is there an official process that those of us with engineering skills can use to get to the correct people internally and work on these kinds of problems?

It takes one of us to get lucky and find someone who is willing to listen and has connections into engineering or knows the process. I tried emailing my contact from the last firmware bug but he sadly passed away. I am working with someone on the Business Escalation team and he just got a path into engineering. This should not stop anyone affected from opening a ticket though. We need more customers reporting this. We are at a disadvantage now compared to the last firmware bug since IPv6-PD users are a small subset of their already small IPv6 user base. To them, IPv6 users are not calling in with issues.

New Contributor

 • 

21 Messages

@allan​ The support person who has been calling me managed to get the internal team to rollback my modem to the previous firmware.  Seems there were some issues and rolling back proved a little troublesome as the modem didn't exactly want to do that.  They are presently "monitoring the situation", I'm not sure exactly what that means.  I'm assuming they are either going to start rolling back other modems, or maybe just fix whatever the bug is.

As someone who has been writing software professionally for almost four decades now I'm rather appalled at the apparent lack of testing.  As I mentioned above these aren't corner cases, and testing them wouldn't involve much expense.

Visitor

 • 

3 Messages

Whatever the issue is, it appears to have also broken ND proxy (detailed in another thread.)

New Contributor

 • 

24 Messages

@gantzm_mi​ The tech who replaced my modem said he knows someone within engineering and he would forward my findings. I don't think that happened since the firmware updated a week later.  No one I spoke with offered the option to rollback. I considered asking for one after reading your post, but I figured it would just upgrade again. Hopefully, they added your modem to a block list but "monitoring the situation" sounds like they are waiting to see what happens next.

I think the most frustrating part is the lack of communication from engineering. Tier 2 support seems to be in the dark like us.

New Contributor

 • 

21 Messages

@allan​ I was informed my modem was locked to this version at the moment.  I don't think my modem is going to automatically update at this point.  What wasn't clear is the path forward.  The support guy was offering a bunch of help but he obviously has no control over firmware engineering.  So I don't know if my modem will update when the next patch comes out.  The actual firmware engineering team doesn't seem very open about what's going on or willing to discuss a path forward.

New problem solver

 • 

16 Messages

18 days ago

Add another one to the mix.  My prefix delegation broke around 0800 UTC on 18 November.  Like others with broken prefix delegation, I have firmware CGA4332COM_8.2p5s1_PROD_sey and packet captures indicating no prefix delegation available from the cell modem.

I've got published AAAA records for services I was hosting that are not reachable.  I did open a case yesterday, but I'm not sure how well the tech was able to document it, given how difficult it was for them to understand my explanation.

It seems pretty clear this is a firmware issue.

New problem solver

 • 

48 Messages

My prefix delegation has been broken since I got a new modem...edit: going on 5 weeks soon. 

After it was replaced, I was getting the wrong block (out of a different /56 than my static).  Then it died for af ew days, came back, and has been down for ~ 10+ days.  Now it's "working" again as of this morning (I think something was done to the cable modem, as I lost all internet for ~ 10 minutes and when it came back PD was working again), and when I mean "working" I mean I get the wrong prefix again, not out of my block.

I'm still hoping this will eventually be fixed.   I was told this was a known issue and it's being worked on in engineering.  I have a thread open in here already in this forum, and the reps have helped me, and it's getting escalated, but just wanted to post something encouraging others to post an issue here so that the reps can get their issue escalated as well.

(edited)

New problem solver

 • 

16 Messages

@rob__jr​ FYI: somehow IPv6 /56's are tied to the modem.  Anytime you get a new modem, the /56 changes.  It's been that way for some time.

New Contributor

 • 

21 Messages

17 days ago

@Comcast_Kei @Comcast_Marcus @Comcast_Sean @Comcast_Alfonso @Comcast_Ray @Comcast_Natalie @Comcast_Jen 

Comcast really needs a "Verified Professional Customer" status that can be used to identify customers who know what they are doing at a networking level.  It is so incredibly frustrating to waste time talking to first level support who isn't even capable of understanding the problem. And this after having to wait the required 10 minutes after an automated modem reboot.  By the time I call support I've rebooted the modem several times over, that 10 minutes is just absolutely gear grinding because it accomplishes absolutely nothing. 

Occasionally I'll hit second tier support and find someone who actually cares and is willing to invest time in solving my problems.   This incident luckily fell into that category.  But many times second tier is just passing e-mails/messages around between me and other departments.

I should be able to call a number, give them my verified status as a professional who knows what he is doing and talk to someone who can manage my problem.  What I don't want is someone asking me what website I can't reach when I'm having an inbound IPv6 issue.  Or, someone who keeps asking me about WiFi issues after I've told them multiple times that I'm using hardwired Ethernet and I don't even have WiFi enabled on the modem.  Or, and this one is the best, can I please unplug and plug in the modem?  Yeah, I can do that but it won't accomplish anything because the modem has a battery in it and nothing is going to happen.  Would you like me to remove the battery and truly do a hard reboot, or are you just guessing?


Most of the problems encountered can probably be solved relatively quickly if someone could deliver the issue to someone who can fix it.  But the overhead of the bureaucracy turns a 10 minute fix into something lasting a month for some people.

I understand you get lots of calls where rebooting the modem probably fixes many issues.  But we aren't customers that are going to call for those problems.  We've already done everything tier 1 support is going to offer.  Please give us direct access to somebody that can help when we real problems.

New Contributor

 • 

24 Messages

I agree with @gantzm_mi  here. We pay a premium for this business-class service with assurances that we get business-class support any time. We should not have to go through the Tier 1 interrogation every time we call for help. I am the IT support for our business and I make sure all the reboots and testing were done before I pick up the phone. I don't want to call support any more than I have to; I have other stuff to do.

New Contributor

 • 

24 Messages

14 days ago

Based on the post by @gantzm_mi I submitted a request to have my modem firmware rolled back. They came through this morning. I am now back on version "CGA4332COM_8.1p8s2_PROD_sey" and our IPv6 is working again.

Official Employee

 • 

34 Messages

 

Hello allan that's wonderful news! Thanks so much for giving us the opportunity to assist, and we're always happy to help with any further account questions and concerns. 

 

New Contributor

 • 

6 Messages

13 days ago

Might as well tack a "me too" onto this thread.  My modem is also running firmware "CGA4332COM_8.2p5s1_PROD_sey" now, and just this afternoon I discovered that IPv6 prefix delegation is no longer working.  (My router is just given a /64, despite requesting a /59, so it can't do anything with it.)  I have no idea when this problem started, but it was probably sometime within the past week or two. (I was on vacation last week.)

I really hope they push a proper fix sometime soon, because I'd rather not deal with a painful tech support interaction to hopefully get a rollback, only to either be permanently stuck on old firmware or encounter the problem again a few weeks later.

New problem solver

 • 

16 Messages

I'd suggest opening a case.  The more they have the more likely someone is going to notice.

I opened mine almost a week ago.  Just called in and it is in a status of "parked," which I'm told means a tier 2 tech has taken ownership.

It's very frustrating to have a business class service have an issue that has an obvious fix and I haven't even heard anything for nearly a week.  Admittedly, a week that includes a Thanksgiving holiday, but it's now two business days after that long weekend.

New problem solver

 • 

16 Messages

12 days ago

Comcast support rolled back my firmware this morning in response to my ticket.  Prefix Delegation is working for me again.  Working firmware version is CGA4332COM_8.1p8s2_PROD_sey

New Contributor

 • 

9 Messages

11 days ago

I'm having a problem with IPV4 static routes no longer working or being able to be entered into my CGA4332COM, at all.  I had implemented some static routes on my LAN side of the modem months ago.  They were working without issue.  Then, first thing one Friday morning in late November the static routes were no longer working.  When troubleshooting I tried removing one of the static routes and adding it back in.  The modem wouldn't let me.  It kept coming back and saying the subnet needed to be correct and the destination next hop needed to exist.  I can say with certainty there were no problems with the subnet, mask, next hop, etc.  The only way I got the static route definition back in that I had removed was to restore a copy of the modem config I'd saved a few weeks prior.  That got the route back in but it still didn't actually work.  I have been unable to get it working since.  I've been in dialogue with a Comcast tech via email about it and starting to make progress with him engaging higher resources on his end to try and get it resolved.  I've already factory reset the modem and tried setting it up from scratch but that has made no difference.

Looking at the topic of THIS discussion, the same kind of failure pattern seems apparent.  Working configuration/behavior suddenly no longer working, with no changes having been made to anything by the customer at all.  I'm letting my Comcast tech know about this thread and I'm asking if he can get my firmware rolled back one rev.  I've got the same version this post is about.  I've got:

Version: CM DOCSIS Application - Prod_23.2_231009 & MTA Application - Prod_23.2_231009

Image: CGA4332COM_8.2p5s1_PROD_sey

(edited)

New Contributor

 • 

9 Messages

Well. someone got my modem rolled back to firmware image      CGA4332COM_8.1p8s2_PROD_sey ...and my static route capabilities are back and working again.

Does anyone have any information about that?

New Contributor

 • 

21 Messages

@user_6ae3dc​ I'm assuming at this point that someone at Comcast finally figured out that the 8.2 firmware was bad and is just rolling everybody back.