New Member
•
4 Messages
Can't send email using my own server to comcast.net email addresses
I can send mail to every other domain, but for some reason all emails going to the comcast.net domain do not go through. I have an screenshot showing the sendmail verbose output when trying to send. I can get the MX record and comcast accepts the email without any error codes. But the email never gets to the recipient. Comcast is blocking something but not giving me any feedback. I need to get this fixed, it is costing me business
train_wreck
Gold Problem solver
•
610 Messages
9 years ago
Can you post the sendmail output? I will say that I have my own postfix-based email server and can send & receive emails to/from comcast.net addresses with no problem.
0
0
train_wreck
Gold Problem solver
•
610 Messages
9 years ago
Yeah nothing looks off there. I'm guessing you've checked the recepients spam folders? And for your own domain, made sure PTRs and SPFs are setup OK?
0
0
joejacobs24
New Member
•
4 Messages
9 years ago
SPF is right because if I send something to a gmail account, it goes through fine. The comcast user I sent it to has nothing , not even SPAM.
What would I be looking for as far as PTR records are concerned?
It seems I only have an issue getting emails through to comcast customers. It use to work until comcast changed our static IP address when we went from 1 static IP to 5.
When we did that, I did have comcast make sure they setup reverse DNS for our new static IP addresses. They assured me it did but it still doesn't get through. I asked them a million times if our IP address is blocked but they do not provide any answer or feedback. I'm at a loss for what to look at next.
0
0
joejacobs24
New Member
•
4 Messages
9 years ago
[root@msaapache ~]# sendmail -v XXXX@comcast.net
test
.
XXXX@comcast.net... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
220 mail.marplesportsarena.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.7/8.14.7; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 10:15:29 -0400
>>> EHLO marplesportsarena.com
250-mail.marplesportsarena.com Hello msaapache [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE
250-DSN
250-ETRN
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
250-DELIVERBY
250 HELP
>>> MAIL From: SIZE=5 AUTH=root@marplesportsarena.com
250 2.1.0... Sender ok
>>> RCPT To:
>>> DATA
250 2.1.5... Recipient ok
354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
>>> .
250 2.0.0 t53EFTv9030007 Message accepted for delivery
XXXX@comcast.net... Sent (t53EFTv9030007 Message accepted for delivery)
Closing connection to [127.0.0.1]
>>> QUIT
221 2.0.0 mail.marplesportsarena.com closing connection
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root
[root@msaapache ~]# sendmail -bv XXXX@comcast.net
XXXX@comcast.net... deliverable: mailer esmtp, host comcast.net., user XXXX@comcast.net
0
0
train_wreck
Gold Problem solver
•
610 Messages
9 years ago
For PTRs, I have understood best practice to be the following. Your domain will have an A record pointing to the IP Address of the mail server, and that IP address should have a PTR that points back to the A record. For example, my A record for my mail server is "mx.pLAN9.co" and points to 50.252.78.1. I contacted Comcast to add a PTR for 50.252.78.1 that has the value "mx.pLAN9.co." The result is shown in the DNS lookups below:
My experience is that some mail servers will attempt to validate PTRs, and some will not.... Perhaps Comcast's mail servers enforce this?
EDIT a site I use often when testing mail server's configuration is http://emailsecuritygrader.com
0
0
joejacobs24
New Member
•
4 Messages
9 years ago
Well, my configuration is a little more complicated. Our actual email is hosted by office365. So all incoming email is directed to that MX server. The sendmail client is only used to send automated email out from our CRM system. The IP address of the sendmail client is authorized to send mail through the SPF. But, if you did an MX lookup of our domain, you would be directed to office365
0
0
CC_John
Retired Employee
•
1.9K Messages
9 years ago
0
0
HIAITDirector
New Member
•
1 Message
9 years ago
Was this solved? I'm having the same issue but couldn't reply to the thread that was moved.
Thanks!
Kevin
0
0